Not indie but relevant anyway.

Not indie but relevant anyway.

Liked it? Take a second to support The Indie Game Reading Club on Patreon!

0 thoughts on “Not indie but relevant anyway.”

  1. 1. “D. & D.” Really, New Yorker?

    2. It took a me a while to realize that this is actually a book review, not a column about D&D’s cultural roots.

    3. Pulling’s son was not “D. & D.-obsessed”.

  2. I’m wondering if the pushback — I’m seeing it over on the Facebook as well — has to do with the book saying untrue things, or unkind things. Honestly I don’t know! And I’m not especially fixated on historic personalities. Just curious. I know how gamers can be.

Leave a Reply